Meet General Stanley McChrysal,
Commander of all troops in Afghanistan
(Here the General works on board a Lockheed C-130 Hercules aircraft)
The ever changing nature of the War on Terrorism:
Below you will find an article that I think probably paints a more accurate perspective regarding today’s decision.
But on the issue at hand, it certainly appears that it is business as usual in today’s News, Washington DC style, as it relates to politics anyway; and more particularly as it relates to the resignation/firing of General Stanley McChrystal, who has been the commander of all US troops in Afghanistan since June of 2009.
What is actually not news is that, as is usually the case, in that what we are being told, and what is the actual truth, never the twain shall meet! Which is a nice way of saying that Washington is spinning the story and lying to us again.
What actually did happen?
Well according to a Rolling Stone’s article that went on the newsstands today, Friday, June 25, there have been problems all long, and as one example here is a statement that was made back in April:
‘How’d I get screwed into going to this dinner?” demands Gen. Stanley McChrystal. It’s a Thursday night in mid-April, and the commander of all U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan is sitting in a four-star suite at the Hotel Westminster in Paris.
He’s in France to sell his new war strategy to our NATO allies – to keep up the fiction, in essence, that we actually have allies.
Since McChrystal took over a year ago, the Afghan war has become the exclusive property of the United States.
Opposition to the war has already toppled the Dutch government, forced the resignation of Germany’s president and sparked both Canada and the Netherlands to announce the withdrawal of their 4,500 troops.
McChrystal is in Paris to keep the French, who have lost more than 40 soldiers in Afghanistan, from going all wobbly on him.
“The dinner comes with the position, sir,” says his chief of staff, Col. Charlie Flynn.
My problem is when there is a disconnect between the men who make strategy, among our Military leadership, and that of our politicians, who have an entirely different agenda; and the views and opinions of the experienced officers are over ruled for reason of political expediency, especially in time of war, it is always our men and women in uniform who lose out, and end up paying the price!
Now on the subject of our politicians lying to us, what else is new; especially in this administration under Obama, as he has done nothing but lie since he took office; and his lies go all the way back to when he first entered into politics back, in early 90’s.
But of course the mark of a successful politician today is that you can make your lies sound convincing and believable, and to that end both Obama and also Bill Clinton have elevated their particular form of guile to an art form. And of course lacking any scrutiny from the major News organizations, who only rubber stamp whatever they say anyway, the general public is none the wiser, and are always kept in the dark.
My problem about this story is that we apparently haven’t yet learned our lesson from the Vietnam War, in that we can ill afford to allow our unscrupulous politicians, who have no combat experience; and who have no skin in any of this at all, beyond their own selfish ambitions, hidden agendas, careers, public image, and public perception of same, to dictate strategy to our fighting men and women on the battle field… because it always ends up costing us more American lives, and unnecessarily loses when we do.
May God help us to wake up and keep us from making that mistake again!
On the subject of lying as it refers to the man Barack Hussein Obama, let’s take a look at the record thus far; and oh yeah, what about that small matter of him lying about his place of birth and his citizenship; and the fact he has yet to provide any evidence whatsoever to prove these allegations are untrue?
Folks this is a constitutional nightmare, and if these allegations are true, he doesn’t even have the legal right to be in the White House, let alone be Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces, especially at a time of war!
In any case here is a partial list that just includes a few of the lies he has told during his first 100 days in office; I don’t have the space nor the time to give you the whole list.
1. Promising to “publish all non-emergency legislation to the website for five days… before the President signs it,” then breaking that promise over and over again.
2. Despite promising to keep lobbyists out of his administration, Obama has broken his word again and again (making 17 exceptions to this promise in his first two weeks).
3. Obama promised to eliminate income taxation for seniors making less than $50,000 a year. He has broken this promise despite numerous opportunities to keep it, including the economic stimulus package and his administration’s first budget proposal.
4. The President also boasted during his campaign that “During 2009 and 2010, existing businesses will receive a $3,000 refundable tax credit for each additional full-time employee hired,” and has failed to keep his word.
5. Obama made it part of his agenda to “allow withdrawals of 15% up to $10,000 from retirement accounts without penalty (although subject to the normal taxes). This would apply to withdrawals in 2008 (including retroactively) and 2009,” but didn’t include this measure in the stimulus package or his budget proposal.
6. Obama broke his promise to recognize the Armenian Genocide.
7. Obama did a shameless 180 degree turn on earmarks by sharply criticizing them (and bragging that he would pass legislation without a single one) and then signing a spending bill with literally thousands of them.
8. Obama promised a $4000 tax credit for college tuition, but backpedaled when he signed a much smaller $2,500 college tax credit into law.
9. Obama called presidential “signing statements” (letters of interpretation and recommendations attached to Congressional legislation) unconstitutional… then attached a signing statement of his own to a $410 billion spending bill.
10. Obama promised a different tone in Washington D.C. and a move past bitter, partisan rhetoric. It took him less than a week as president to berate Republicans and sully the dignity of his office by picking a very public rhetorical fight with a private citizen, Rush Limbaugh.
11. In his first private meeting with Congressional Republicans, instead of “reaching across the aisle” and seeking earnest dialogue, he smugly told them that he should have his way because “I won.”
12. The White House violated the custom of keeping private meetings private by leaking this comment to the press.
13. Taking a page out of the Bush Administration‘s playbook, Obama applied shrill, frantic, fear-mongering rhetoric to assure passage of his stimulus package.
14. Obama revealed the duplicity of his rhetoric and the arrogance of his character when he took off on a ritzy Valentine’s Day vacation in Chicago for the weekend instead of signing the stimulus bill that he said needed to be passed as soon as possible to avert an irreversible economic meltdown.
15. Obama did not criticize Congress for its secrecy and closed-door committee meetings in crafting the stimulus package despite his calls for greater transparency in Washington.
16. Obama’s appointment of Hillary Clinton to the office of Secretary of State was unconstitutional.
17. His movement of the United States Census out of the Department of Commerce and under the direct control of the White House was unconstitutional, politically motivated, and a dangerous, undemocratic expansion of executive power.
18. Obama’s decision to continue Federal funding for religious organizations that discriminate on the basis of religion is unconstitutional and just plain unseemly for a “liberal” Democrat.
19. One promise Obama has kept is in his distribution of TARP II funds to non-financial institutions, which is contrary to the stated intention of those funds in the legislation passed by Congress, making his action illegal, unconstitutional, and an expansion of unlimited executive power.
20. Despite the buzz surrounding Obama’s closing of Gitmo, indefinite detainment and torture are alive and well under Obama’s administration with his chilling executive order to continue the practice of “CIA renditions” -secret abductions and transfers of prisoners to other countries where they are detained indefinitely and their interrogations are outsourced to other governments.
21. Backing “the continued imprisonment of enemy combatants in Afghanistan without trial.”
22. Asking “the Supreme Court to overrule long-standing law that stops police from initiating questions unless a defendant’s lawyer is present, another stark example of the White House seeking to limit rather than expand rights.”
23. Limiting “the rights of prisoners to test genetic evidence used to convict them.”
24. Despite claiming our environment is in a state of crisis, Obama‘s extravagant inauguration alone emitted over 500 million pounds of CO2.
25. His lavish inauguration also cost $170 million.
26. After saying “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times… and then just expect that every country is going to say okay,” journalists discovered that Obama cranks the thermostat in the Oval Office.
27. Obama‘s Earth Day flights burned more than 9,000 gallons of fuel.
28. The Obama Administration ended funding for Washington D.C.’s school voucher program, while suppressing a study that showed it delivered better results at a lower cost.
29. Obama’s daughters however, attend a private school in Washington D.C., enjoying the freedom of educational choice that the Obama administration has denied to poor children who live in Washington.
30. Out-of-control deficit spending.
31. Blaming Bush for America’s deficits, but then increasing spending.
32. This is after saying on the campaign trail: “There is no doubt that we’ve been living beyond our means and we’re going to have to make some adjustments.”
33. Made a big show of challenging his cabinet to cut a measly $100 million from the Federal budget (a .0027% cut in Federal spending).
34. Admitting that this doesn’t even represent a spending cut by saying that it will free up more money for Federal spending on other things like health and education.
35. Moving to convert U.S. Federal loans to banking institutions into common stock, effectively nationalizing major portions of the U.S. banking industry.
36. Forcing U.S. banks to accept TARP money, then attaching strings ex post facto.
37. Acting to oust corporate executives like the CEOs of GM and Citigroup.
38. Promising that the U.S. government (i.e. American taxpayers) will guarantee GM’s warranty.
39. Every time Obama talks about the economy or signs economic legislation, the stock market tanks.
40. “We can’t go back to a bubble and bust economy.” President Obama on April 14, while touting the kind of inflationary monetary policies that cause bubble and bust cycles.
41. “The Obama administration is signaling to Congress that the president could support taxing some employee health benefits, as several influential lawmakers and many economists favor, to help pay for overhauling the health care system. The proposal is politically problematic for President Obama, however, since it is similar to one he denounced in the presidential campaign as ‘the largest middle-class tax increase in history.”
42. Increasing the timetable for withdrawal from Iraq beyond his campaign promises and leaving 50,000 troops in Iraq after the “withdrawal.”
43. Deploying 17,000 more troops to Afghanistan, then several thousand more on top of that.
44. Obama calling on European leaders at G20 to provide more troops for the war in Afghanistan: “Europe should not simply expect the United States to shoulder that burden alone. This is a joint problem it requires a joint effort.”
45. Using Bush-era war rhetoric and tactics.
46. Officially changing the name of America’s vast, expensive, and endless overseas wars to “Overseas Contingency Operation.”
47. “President Barack Obama asked Congress on Thursday for $83.4 billion for U.S. military and diplomatic operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, pressing for special troop funding that he opposed two years ago when he was senator and George W. Bush was president. This would push the costs of the two wars to almost $1 trillion since Sept. 11, 2001.”
48. “President Obama’s plan to require private insurance carriers to reimburse the Department of Veterans Affairs for the treatment of troops injured in service has infuriated veterans groups who say the government is morally obligated to pay for service-related medical care.”
49. Appointing Tim Geithner to the office of Secretary of the Treasury, even though he was a part of the problem with the economic status quo and evaded his taxes for years.
50. Selected Annette Nazareth for the position of Deputy Treasury Secretary, who withdrew after a month long probe into her taxes.
51. Appointed Tom Daschle to the Department of Health and Human Services, who had to resign his nomination for the position because of tax evasion.
52. “Barack Obama has been embroiled in a cronyism row after reports that he intends to make Louis Susman, one of his biggest fundraisers, the new US ambassador in London. The selection of Mr. Susman, a lawyer and banker from the president’s hometown of Chicago, rather than an experienced diplomat, raises new questions about Mr Obama’s commitment to the special relationship with Britain.”
53. Appointed Nancy Killefer for Chief Performance Officer, but she had to step down because she didn’t pay her taxes either!
54. Samantha Power resigned from the Obama campaign f0r calling Hillary Clinton a “monster,” but was later hired by the Obama Administration for a position on the National Security Council.
55. Appointed Rahm Emmanuel as Chief of Staff, who failed to report five years of free rent at a US Congressman’s property in accordance with IRS policy and congressional ethics rules.
56. Adolfo Carrion, Director of White House Office of Urban Affairs, “pocketed thousands of dollars in campaign cash from city developers whose projects he approved or funded with taxpayers’ money.”
57. Appointed Janet Napolitano to the office of Secretary of Homeland Security, who was clueless enough to falsely claim that the 9-11 terrorists came into America through Canada.
58. “The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned or suffering from the psychological effects of war is being replicated today.” — Department of Homeland Security intelligence report
59. Transparency: “Administration Permits Only One Question, No Follow-Ups About Extremism Report”
60. Appointing Attorney General Eric Holder, who said “Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards.”
61. AIG’s second biggest campaign donation beneficiary: Barack Obama, who acted angry about the results of a bailout he helped to craft as U.S. Senator.
62. “For months, the Obama administration and members of Congress have known that insurance giant AIG was getting ready to pay huge bonuses while living off government bailouts. It wasn’t until the money was flowing and news was trickling out to the public that official Washington rose up in anger and vowed to yank the money back.”
63. Giving Henrietta Hughes a house instead of downsizing the government to free up productive capital that could be used by businesses to employ her so that she can afford her own living arrangements while providing value to other Americans.
64. Warmly greeting, smiling at, and shaking hands with Venezuela’s brutal, autocratic dictator- Hugo Chávez.
65. Bowing to Saudi King Abdullah. U.S. Presidents do not bow before foreign monarchs.
66. Then a White House aide poorly and awkwardly lied about it: “It wasn’t a bow. He grasped his hand with two hands, and he’s taller than King Abdullah.”
67. At their first meeting, U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s gift to Obama: “an ornamental pen holder made from the timbers of the Victorian anti-slave ship HMS Gannet,” and “a framed commission for HMS Resolute and a first edition of the seven-volume biography of Churchill by Sir Martin Gilbert.” Obama’s gift to Brown: a box set of 25 classic American DVDs… that don’t work on European DVD players.
68. Used “England” to denote the U.K. -a gaffe that people from Scotland, Ireland, and Wales don’t appreciate and chalk up to American ignorance and parochialism.
69. Repeatedly reminding House Republicans that none of them voted for the stimulus package. He’s really going to regret that during the 2010 midterm elections when they’ll be the ones reminding America.
70. “The White House says the president is unaware of the tea parties-” either they’re lying or the President is clueless. Pick one.
71. “Mr Obama is an accomplished orator but is becoming known in America as the “teleprompt president” over his reliance on the machine when he gives a speech.”
72. This has lead to numerous gaffes such as Obama thanking himself for being invited to speak with the Irish Prime Minister, as well as…
73. The bizarre spectacle of the President “arguing with” a teleprompter during a recent speech.
74. “I’ve been practicing bowling. I bowled a 129. It was like the Special Olympics or something.” -Obama on The Tonight Show
75. Choosing purebred dog, “Bo” for the White House family’s “first dog” instead of adopting a dog from a shelter like Obama promised.
76. Gaffe: “I didn’t want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances.” -President Obama
77. False: “More than 90% of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States.” -President Obama
78. What? “If we do everything right, if we do it with absolute certainty, if we stand up there and we really make the tough decisions, there’s still a 30% chance we’re going to get it wrong.” -Vice President Biden
79. Clueless: “You know, I’m embarrassed. Do you know the Web site number? I should have it in front of me and I don’t. I’m actually embarrassed.” -Vice President Biden, who should be.
80. Scary: Obama to Rep. Peter DeFazio, one of the Democratic congressman who voted against the stimulus package, “Don’t think we’re not keeping score, brother.”
81. Airforce 1 panics New York City residents with extremely low flight plan for photo op and no public announcement.
82. Obama’s perpetual campaign. The only thing our President has ever really led in his life was his campaign… instead of actually governing, he’s been sticking to what he knows for the past 100 days- campaigning.
83. Obama’s perpetual campaign failing.
84. Brushing off, laughing at, and dismissing a serious and valid question about the legalization of Marijuana and its impact on our economy.
86. The regressive cigarette tax that falls mostly on lower income households to fund SCHIP.
87. Buying into and perpetuating the swine flu hysteria.
88. Allowing the Department of Homeland Security to take the lead in managing the swine flu. It should be the responsibility of the Department of Health and Human Services. Flu epidemics are not national security issues- they’re health issues. Conflating the two is a dangerous precedent that puts too much power into the hands of the DHS.
89. Making a big flashy deal out of releasing the President’s and Vice President’s income tax returns (Oooohh- transparency!), which every President has done for years now.
90. Being totally shown up by the Bushes– according to their respective tax returns, the Obamas gave 6.5% of their 2008 income to charity while the Bushes gave 23% of theirs to charity in 2007. Embarrassing.
91. Supporting and signing The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Stimulus Package)
92. The health provisions in the stimulus bill.
93. Actually believing and preaching to others that consumption, not production, drives economic growth.
94. Obama’s war on small business.
95. Bragging about his tax cut for 95% of Americans and not realizing (or conveniently not addressing) the fact that if it’s funded with deficits and debt, it isn’t really a tax cut because taxpayers will have to pay off the debt eventually (with interest) and the tax cut is offset by the rising prices of inflation.
96. Echoing Bernanke and Geithner’s line that the economy needs more credit, while running trillion dollar deficits that hog up the credit market.
97. Timothy Geithner getting owned by Congressman Michelle Bachmann during his testimony in Congress.
98. Blatantly and unambiguously supporting policies that take from poor and middle class Americans to give to wealthy businesses and corporate executives.
99. Justifying these policies by saying that these businesses support poor Americans by giving them jobs and that they are simply “too big to fail.”
100. Not realizing how suspiciously similar his argument sounds to “trickle-down,” supply-side, Reaganomics.
~by W. E. Messamore , posted on Tuesday, April 28, 2009
All of this points up one thing, and that is the absolute necessity that we have a complete housecleaning in our government from the top down; and that we restore again our Constitutional Republic, and replace these self-serving political opportunists, who lie to us constantly, with honest men and women, who sincerely have our best interest at heart, and who most importantly will put our nation back on track with God; and make laws and policy that do not offend Him, that are actually in the best interest of our nation, and for our nation’s future.
My prayer for America is for a grassroots Spiritual Awakening that grows like wild fire all across our land, that will ignite the sort of revival that our nation so desperately needs!
Truly, this is our ONLY hope for survival, as a free people; and if this doesn’t happen soon, I believe our days as a free people are numbered!
So with that, I will just leave you again with the same admonition, and that is let us continue to Watch and Pray… and let us truly pray for the sort of “Change” that brings our country back to God!
A ‘do over’ in Afghanistan?
Posted By Stephen M. Walt
Thursday, June 24, 2010 – 11:08 AM
Contrary to what many (but not all) commentators seem to think, the firing of Stanley McChrystal and his replacement by General David Petraeus is not that significant. To be more precise, it will only be a significant event if Obama uses this shift as an opportunity to move towards withdrawal. Otherwise, we’ll just rearrange some deck chairs and watch the war effort continue to founder.
Until the Rolling Stone article surfaced, there was little sign that Obama was unhappy with McChrystal’s handling of the war. (Gareth Porter of IPS reports that there was in fact growing discontent within the administration over the lack of progress, but it hadn’t surfaced in any visible way.) More importantly, there was no sign that Petraeus
had serious problems with McChrystal’s performance or visible doubts about the need to continue the fight until “victory” was achieved. Don’t forget that Petraeus’s status and prestige is based on his knowledge of and commitment to counter-insurgency (COIN) warfare, and COIN is exactly what McChrystal was doing too. Unlike the “surge” in Iraq, which involved a fundamental shift in U.S. strategy and tactics, there is no reason to expect Petraeus to implement a fundamentally different approach in Afghanistan. The subhead in today’s New York Times says it all: “Obama Says Afghan Policy Won’t Change after Dismissal.” Uh-oh.
There is also no reason to believe Petraeus will achieve significantly different results because the problem in Afghanistan is not the quality of our generals. Bad leadership can hamper a war effort, of course, but it is a fallacy to think that all we need to do is get the right leader in place at the top and then all will be well. (Military history is often written in ways that glorifies the role of the “great captains,” but there’s a lot more to military success than just a smart and inspired commanders).
The real problem is that our campaign in Afghanistan is like trying to nail jelly to the wall. The Karzai government is a liability, not an asset, and we have no way of making it perform better. Similarly, we have no way of forcing the Taliban to sit still and fight us out in the open — where they would be easy to beat — when confronted by superior force, they simply melt away and wait us out. Although troop morale seems to be good, our forces have been fighting a long time and burnout is beginning to set in. Our NATO allies are leaving the field, and Americans are beginning to realize that the costs of continuing this fight exceed either the benefits of victory or the risks of withdrawal. “Victory” in Afghanistan — whatever that might mean — wouldn’t make al Qaeda a lot weaker; and “failure” wouldn’t make them much stronger either. Putting a new general in charge doesn’t change that calculus at all.
Third, some prominent commentators like Andrew Sullivan now worry that Obama is in effect hostage to Petraeus, because the latter’s stature and prestige will make it almost impossible for Obama to overrule him should he ask for more troops or seek to continue the war indefinitely. That is an obvious danger, but that same prestige and stature also makes Petraeus the best person to help Obama sell a prudent decision to cut our losses and get out. Moreover, Petraeus’ stature is based primarily on the supposed success of the 2007 “surge” in Iraq, a campaign that achieved the tactical objective of lowering the level of violenace but did not achieve the strategic goal of political reconciliation. If Iraq goes south again as U.S. forces withdraw, some of Petraeus’s current luster is bound to diminish and Obama’s freedom of maneuver might increase.
In any case, the only important question here is what Obama is telling Petraeus to do. In essence, McChrystal’s gaffe has given Obama a chance for a “do-over.” He made the wrong choice in the fall of 2009, when he agreed to escalate the U.S. presence despite all the obvious pitfalls. Has he learned from the results of the past nine months? Does he now realize that he is not the master of events in Afghanistan, and that he cannot achieve success there simply by giving inspiring speeches and sending more troops? And has he begun to sense that this war might not be winnable at acceptable cost, and that continuing the fight is putting his entire presidency at risk?
If he has, he’ll tell Petraeus that his mission isn’t to pacify Afghanistan, build a stable central government there, or even “defeat, disrupt, and defeat al Qaeda” (which isn’t in Afghanistan anymore). Rather, his mission is to find a way for the United States to end this futile and unnecessary adventure in social engineering, so that we can turn our attention (and our finite resources) to more pressing problems.
If Obama hasn’t learned that lesson, then he will find himself stuck in the Afghan quagmire for the remainder of his time in office. As with Johnson in Vietnam and Bush in Iraq, the war will suck the life out of his presidency and make it impossible to achieve more urgent domestic and international priorities. And because he’s now had two opportunities to chart a different course, it will have been entirely his own doing.